MP response displeases reader

The Editor,
I have been following the Colacem municipal zoning issue for a few months now. I read The Review’s publication of Mr. Champagne’s Open Letter to the riding’s MP and MPP as well as M.P. Francis Drouin’s reply to same. I guess I, like everyone else, will wait ’til the cows come home before we hear from Mr. Crack.
Without knowing all the particulars, I can say that Mr. Drouin’s reply has left me with a sour taste in my mouth. It’s not that he has skirted around the points Mr. Champagne has raised and failed to address any of them head on. It has to do with the fact that he has chosen to reply by deriding a fellow Liberal M.P. on her decision to ask the municipal politicians whose responsibility she admits it is to decide on a “municipal property zoning matter” in her riding to not only consider the planning considerations involved “but also the social impacts the municipal decision would have on the citizens she also represents’’. That he goes on to describe her concerns about the health and social impacts  of the citizens she represents as those of a “a demagogue” is quite frankly shocking, in poor taste and far from those of what he indicates should be those of a “political leader that uses rational arguments’’. If that is how Mr. Drouin interprets a fellow Liberal colleague’s call on her municipal level politicians to consider the social impacts their decision will have on the citizens she and they both represent, Mr. Drouin’s sense of ethics and his definition of a ‘’political leader’’ differ greatly from mine.
While he characterizes Mona Fortier’s interventions as a bark with no bite, I view them as the mark of a political leader whose bark alone carries weight. On a much higher ground than that of a politician with neither bark or bite.
Dr. Denis Labelle,
D.H.A.
Gatineau

Read Gary Champagne’s letter.

Read Glengarry-Prescott-Russell MP Francis Drouin’s letter of response to Gary Champagne’s letter.


While you are here, we have a small ask.

More people are reading The Review than ever before — across our many platforms. So far, we have not put up a paywall to limit the stories you can read. We want to keep you in the news loop. But advertising revenues are increasingly going to the big two: you know who they are. If you value The Review’s independent, local community journalism, or you value the many ways we support dozens of community organizations in their endeavours, consider supporting our work. It takes time, effort and professional smarts to stay on top of community news and present well-researched, objective news articles on issues which matter to you.

If you read stories on this website, or you have come here from an Instant Article post on Facebook, think about subscribing. It would be a vote of confidence for the work that we do, and for the future well-being of your community.

Subscribe today?


 

Louise Sproule

Louise Sproule

Publisher at The Review
Louise Sproule has been the publisher of The Review since 1992. A part-time job after high school at The Review got Sproule hooked on community newspapers and all that they represent. She loves to write, has covered every kind of event you can think of, loves to organize community events and loves her small town and taking photographs across the region. She dreams of writing a book one day so she can finally tell all of the town's secrets! She must be stopped! Keep subscribing to The Review . . . or else!
Louise Sproule

Louise Sproule

Louise Sproule has been the publisher of The Review since 1992. A part-time job after high school at The Review got Sproule hooked on community newspapers and all that they represent. She loves to write, has covered every kind of event you can think of, loves to organize community events and loves her small town and taking photographs across the region. She dreams of writing a book one day so she can finally tell all of the town's secrets! She must be stopped! Keep subscribing to The Review . . . or else!

louise has 470 posts and counting.See all posts by louise