OMB outdated, and never mind about precedents

To The Editor,

A few comments on the February 28 editorial regarding Action Champlain’s request of Champlain Council for $200,000 to assist with the payment of legal representation at the Ontario Municipal Board hearing on Colacem’s rezoning plans.

It was stated that Champlain council might deny the request because of the ‘precedent’ it could create. ‘Precedent’ is an oft-used and convenient excuse for shutting down discussion without any engagement in Common Sense. For example: a) When was the last time any citizens’ group requested financial support from council before an OMB hearing? b) Have any opponents of wind farms, solar projects or clear-cutting requested financial support from council to go before the OMB? c) Does Champlain Council share the same position as Action Champlain?

The answer to the above is: a) Not in recent memory; b) No group has requested financial support; c) Yes, Champlain, Hawkesbury and East Hawkesbury voted against the re-zoning. Clearly, the argument of ‘precedent’ holds no water whatsoever.

The editorial also states, “Perhaps the answer is not really about whether or not the township should support Action Champlain. Perhaps the real need is effecting changes to the OMB...” This is not an either/or situation. The OMB is outdated, undemocratic and answerable to no one. It consistently rules in favour of developers and against citizens and often even against democratically-elected municipalities. Developers have bottomless pockets; citizens have empty pockets. The province recognizes this and is moving to ‘de-fang’ the OMB.

The Colacem cement plant is a public health issue. On that matter alone, Action Champlain should be supported by Champlain Council. And the Council should be prepared to go further. When the OMB inevitably sides with Colacem and against the citizens, Council should appeal directly to premier Kathleen Wynn – the only one who can overturn an OMB ruling.

Sincerely,

ian hepburn, Vankleek Hill


While you are here, we have a small ask.

More people are reading The Review than ever before — across our many platforms. So far, we have not put up a paywall to limit the stories you can read. We want to keep you in the news loop. But advertising revenues are increasingly going to the big two: you know who they are. If you value The Review’s independent, local community journalism, or you value the many ways we support dozens of community organizations in their endeavours, consider supporting our work. It takes time, effort and professional smarts to stay on top of community news and present well-researched, objective news articles on issues which matter to you.

If you read stories on this website, or you have come here from an Instant Article post on Facebook, think about subscribing. It would be a vote of confidence for the work that we do, and for the future well-being of your community.

Subscribe today?


 

Louise Sproule

Louise Sproule

Publisher at The Review
Louise Sproule has been the publisher of The Review since 1992. A part-time job after high school at The Review got Sproule hooked on community newspapers and all that they represent. She loves to write, has covered every kind of event you can think of, loves to organize community events and loves her small town and taking photographs across the region. She dreams of writing a book one day so she can finally tell all of the town's secrets! She must be stopped! Keep subscribing to The Review . . . or else!
Louise Sproule

Louise Sproule

Louise Sproule has been the publisher of The Review since 1992. A part-time job after high school at The Review got Sproule hooked on community newspapers and all that they represent. She loves to write, has covered every kind of event you can think of, loves to organize community events and loves her small town and taking photographs across the region. She dreams of writing a book one day so she can finally tell all of the town's secrets! She must be stopped! Keep subscribing to The Review . . . or else!

louise has 475 posts and counting.See all posts by louise