Friday’s Ontario Municipal Board pre-hearing was a new opportunity to debate the Colacem cement plant’s validity in the region. One of the attendees at the meeting signed up as a participant in support of the plant. He raised many valid concerns: the “stagnation” of the local population, the need for jobs, an exodus of young people.
But will a cement plant really fix these problems?
According to Colacem Canada’s website for the proposed L’Orignal plant, it will create 200 construction jobs, and 300 long-term jobs. But dig a little deeper and that claim falls to 125 “direct employment opportunities” and 175 “indirect employment opportunities.” If those numbers hold up–a big if–that means 200 temporary construction jobs, 125 opportunities without a guarantee of employment and 175 over which it really has no control.
The attendee at the meeting mentioned a secondary service industry cropping up once the plant is built. Trucks will need fixing and he also mentioned the need to buy office supplies. It’s important to remember Colacem already exists here; it isn’t a new industry. Management already knows where trucks can be serviced, it already has a staple source for office supplies.
There is no innovation to Colacem.
Where is there innovation? (Here’s to sounding like a broken record.) Green energy.
In 2014, it was reported that the total number of people employed in the renewable energy sector—23,000 at the time—surpassed the number of people with a job related to the oilsands. In 2016, an additional 13,000 people were working in renewable energy. Despite that, Canada’s renewables sector still wasn’t growing as quickly as that of other countries.
Last year, the country’s investment into renewables fell by about 46 per cent. That’s mostly because the investments are finally coming to fruition. A large part of that money has gone to green energy projects in Ontario, especially wind turbine projects.
The rapid investments have come with their own set of downfalls–mainly Ontario overproducing power and selling electricity at a loss. That’s been reflected on Ontarians’ hydro bills.
And proposed projects have also come with opposition. Just look at the proposed wind farm in St-Bernardin.
But, none of that is inherently the fault of green energy. Political boondoggles abound—or maybe because of so many boondoggles—the industry has continued to grow.
On the flip side, traditional manufacturing jobs are more at-risk than ever of being rendered obsolete by new technologies.
Automation has been a buzzword for the past few years. Various reports show the number of potential jobs to be automated at 41 or 42 per cent, and according to one Globe and Mail story, “the communities most susceptible tend to have smaller populations with an outsize share of manufacturing or natural resources jobs.”
That same story specifically mentions Hawkesbury and notes, based on a study, that 48 per cent of jobs in the area are at risk of automation, mostly in the retail trade sector. That’s about 2,371 jobs overall, which dwarfs the proposed 125 “employment opportunities” suggested at Colacem—a portion of which is also at risk of automation.
The attendee at the pre-hearing justified his approval of Colacem by saying he was looking at “the bigger picture.” But right now, that bigger picture is showing that a traditional cement plant may not be the most effective way to bring in jobs and boost the local economy.
Jobs are critical to the region’s survival; no one is disputing that claim. But rather than settle for the same old jobs at risk of leaving, as was the case of CIP and other plant jobs, maybe it’s time Prescott-Russell starts searching and investing in attracting jobs fit for the 21st century.
While you are here, we have a small ask.
More people are reading The Review than ever before — across our many platforms. So far, we have not put up a paywall to limit the stories you can read. We want to keep you in the news loop. But advertising revenues are increasingly going to the big two: you know who they are. If you value The Review’s independent, local community journalism, or you value the many ways we support dozens of community organizations in their endeavours, consider supporting our work. It takes time, effort and professional smarts to stay on top of community news and present well-researched, objective news articles on issues which matter to you.
If you read stories on this website, or you have come here from an Instant Article post on Facebook, think about subscribing. It would be a vote of confidence for the work that we do, and for the future well-being of your community.
Latest posts by Francis Tessier-Burns (see all)
- Fourteen more long-term care beds not enough: LHIN - March 23, 2018
- Dropping tax rates, keeping tax increases and a possible new tax class in UCPR - March 20, 2018
- The Prescott-Russell trail is on ‘life support’ until 2020 - March 13, 2018